So there we were, obviously a shifty looking crew, me, two kids, a grandmother and a big daft dog with a halter-type face mask on. We were plodding along the street at snail’s pace, the dog, huge as he is was neither pulling nor showing any interest in anything other than his ‘weans’ as he likes to keep an eye on them when they are gadding about.
On the other side of the street, a wee hairy mop of a dog was yapping its head off and slinging bribes in our direction, but Tito, to his credit, didn’t blink an eye at it.
That didn’t stop a police car from coming to a stop a couple of feet ahead of us and the coppers inside it, giving me a stern talking to about the fact the dog didn’t have a muzzle on. Actually the face mask he was wearing gives me more control than a muzzle would and also effectively pulls his mouth shut if there were to be any trouble. The pc on the other side of the car got our and bobbed about shouting that this was a dangerous dog. “No, he’s not!” my mother scoffed while Tito threw himself to the ground with a huge sigh of boredom.
Only a couple of days before an elderly lady had been mugged in the area by three local boys on a scooter. One got her round the neck, while a second grabbed her bag. In total they got away with about €150 in booty but they left the woman feeling very shaky and upset. Worst of all is that the locals say even the police know who the wee thugs are but can’t touch them because they are under 16.
Meanwhile, Tito’s eyes had glazed over and he rolled on his side totally disgusted with this interruption to our pleasant family walk. We were finally let off the hook after being threatened with a steep fine and assorted dire penalties if the dog was not wearing a muzzle the next time they saw me with him.
Do you think it would have made a difference if I told the police that Tito was under 16?



So, does Tito fall under the Dangerous Dogs Act, I didn’t think so? Although I think they have written it so that they can almost include anything they want to if they put their minds to it.
Our Boxer, Oscar wears a Halti and I have seen a few Police looking carefully as we have passed by.
Maybe they should introduce a Dangerous Owners Act, I think that would have far more success
I went to the Cultural Centre this morning, Stephen, to see about a license. The lady there told me that dogo canario is not included in the Dangerous Dogs Act. I didn’t think so either, but the policeman was so adamant that he was, that I thought I must be mistaken.
He also told me that everyone who walks Tito needs to be named on the license. That turns out to be a load of cobblers as well. Although I am usually the one who takes him out anyway it just shows that PC Plod was talking through a hole in his … proverbial.
Do you know of any more concrete sources about the DD Act as it pertains to Tenerife?